logo 18 • CAMLOG Partner Magazine • July 2018 21 Fig. 16: Status after implant exposure in the maxilla with lateralization of the gingiva. Fig. 17: Status after insertion of the ceramic telescopic anchor in the upper jaw. Fig. 18: Customized removable telescopic ceramic maxillary prosthesis. CASE STUDY In summary it can be stated that autologous bone grafts are ideal for augmentation procedures due to their biological, immunological and biomechanical value and their forensic superiority [8]. The application is only restricted by the limited availability [9]. The mechanical (cortical) and osteogenetic (cancellous bone) properties are better than in allogeneic, xenogeneic and alloplastic procedures [10]. My special thanks go to the co-author Dr.Thomas Thein, Karlsruhe. Dr. Karina Lohr After training as a goldsmith and graduating as a master goldsmith in 2000, Dr. Karina Lohr trained as a web designer and DIP specialist at the Academy for New Media in Ludwigsburg. After graduating, she studied dentistry at the University Hospital in Heidelberg from 2003 to 2008. Since 2008 she has been working in the practice clinic for maxillofacial surgery in Karlsruhe. In 2013, Dr. Karina Lohr was recognized as a specialist in oral surgery with a focus on implant dentistry. Contact details Practice Clinic Dr. Thomas Thein and Colleagues Maxillofacial and plastic surgery Stephanplatz 1 76133 Karlsruhe info@praxisklinik-postgalerie.de AUTHOR [1] de Groot RJ1, Oomens MAEM2, Forouzanfar T3, Schulten EAJM3. J Oral Rehabil. Bone augmenta-tion followed by implant surgery in the edentulous mandible: A systematic review. 018 Apr;45(4):334-343. [2] Axhausen W: 2. Die Individual- und Artspezifität des transplantierten Knochengewebes. Lan-genbecks Arch Klin Chir Ver Dtsch Z Chir 306: 18-25 (1964) [3] Gnamm C: Die biologische Qualität des Transferknochens: Gibt es Unter-schiede in den ver-schiedenen Spenderregionen? Med Dissertation, LMU München, S. 47-52 (2006) [4] Holz U, Weller S, Borell-Kost S: Indikation, Technik und Ergebnisse der au-togenen Knochen-transplantation. Chirurg 53: 219-224 (1982) [5] Brzenska I: Augmentationsplastiken mit großvolumigen kortikalen und spongiösen Tibiatrans-plantaten. Eine Darstellung ambulanter Operationsverfah-ren. Med Dissertation, Charité Uni-versitätsmedizin Berlin, S. 50-57 [6] Hirsch JM, Ericsson I: Maxillary sinus augmentation using mandibular bone grafts and simultane-ous installation of implants. A surgical technique. Clin Oral Implants Res 2: 91-96 (1991) [7] Khoury F: Augmentation of the sinus floor with mandibular bone block and simultaneous implantation: a 6-year clinical investigation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 14: 557-564 (1999) [8] Misch CM: Comparison of intraoral donor sites for onlay grafting prior to im-plant placement. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 12: 767-776 (1997) [9] Klinge B, Alberius P, Isaksson S, Jönsson J: Osseous response to implanted natural bone mineral and synthetic hydroxylapatite ceramic in the repair of experimental skull bone defects. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 50: 241-249 (1992) [10] Arx T von, Kurt B: Die enorale Knochenentnahme zur Autotransplantation. Eine klinische Vergleichsstudie der Entnahmestellen im Kinnbereich und in der Retromolar-Region. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 108: 446-459 (1998) LITERATURE
RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTE0MzMw